Call or text (619) 202-1390

Trenchless Sewer Repair Methods: Comparing Spray Epoxy Lining, CIPP, and Pipe Bursting

Trenchless sewer repair methods are transforming the way homeowners and contractors address underground pipe problems. These modern solutions offer cleaner, faster, and often more cost-effective alternatives to traditional excavation—eliminating weeks of disruption, torn-up landscaping, and expensive restoration work.

Techniques such as spray/brush epoxy lining (SIPP), cured-in-place pipe (CIPP), and pipe bursting allow technicians to repair or replace sewer lines with minimal digging and little to no surface damage. In this article, we’ll explore the most effective times to use each trenchless method and how they compare in terms of cost, durability, and repair time.

Why Are Trenchless Sewer Repair Methods Better Than Digging?

Trenchless Sewer Repair Methods

Trenchless Sewer Repair Methods

Trenchless sewer repair and replacement technologies restore the functionality of damaged sewer systems or replace old pipes with new ones—without the need for large-scale excavation.

While installing a completely new sewer system through traditional digging can be the most thorough solution, it often requires tearing up floors, driveways, or landscaping, which significantly increases project costs and disruption. Many homeowners are looking for faster, less invasive alternatives. That’s why roughly 90% of our customers choose partial or complete trenchless rehabilitation.

Trenchless methods require only one or two small access points to reach the problem area, avoiding the need to expose the entire pipe run. This means:

In urban environments—where underground utilities, tight spaces, and costly surface finishes make excavation challenging—trenchless repair is often the superior choice. While both trenchless and traditional digging aim to restore damaged or aging sewer lines, their methods, timelines, and impacts are entirely different.

The benefits of trenchless sewer repair are hard to ignore:

Trenchless sewer repair is efficient, durable, and minimally disruptive—making it a smart choice for many homeowners and property managers.

There are three main trenchless sewer repair or replacement methods:

  1. CIPP Inversion/Pull-in-Place
  2. Spray or Brush Epoxy Lining (SIPP)
  3. Pipe Bursting

While these technologies differ in application and ideal use cases, they share some similarities in preparation. All require far less time for pipe restoration compared to open-cut excavation. And while they may appear more expensive initially, they often result in substantial savings thanks to the elimination of costly landscape restoration.

Each method comes with its own advantages, disadvantages, and best-use scenarios—details we’ll cover next.

Spray/Brush Epoxy Lining (SIPP): When It’s the Right Choice

Spray/Brush Epoxy Lining (SIPP)

Spray/Brush Epoxy Lining (SIPP)

The spray or brush-applied epoxy pipe lining method is a versatile trenchless repair option for sealing holes, cracks, and minor defects—particularly at the bottom of the pipe or around connection ports. Using specialized equipment, technicians apply an even coat of epoxy resin inside the pipe. Once cured, this creates a smooth, seamless, waterproof lining that seals damage and protects against future corrosion or buildup.

This method can be performed through almost any access point and works well for sewer and drain pipes with diameters of two to three inches or more. It is especially useful in complex pipe layouts, including areas with multiple branches, connections, and tight turns—up to 90°. While it cannot restore pipes with severe structural cracks, it is highly effective for sealing couplings, preventing clogs, and stopping root intrusion.

The result is a corrosion-resistant interior surface that can extend a pipe’s lifespan by 50+ years.

Advantages

  • Prevents clogs and root intrusion
  • Repairs small cracks, holes, and invisible defects
  • Handles pipe angles up to 90°
  • Seals fittings, splits, and couplings

Disadvantages

  • Does not add structural strength to the pipe
  • Cannot repair severe damage or missing pipe sections

CIPP Lining (Cured-in-Place Pipe): When to Use It for Sewer Repair

CIPP Lining (Cured-in-Place Pipe)

CIPP Lining (Cured-in-Place Pipe)

CIPP lining restores damaged sewer pipes by creating a new structural pipe inside the old one. A liner saturated with epoxy is inserted—either pulled into place or inverted using an air-pressure inversion machine. Once positioned, the liner is cured, forming a strong, seamless layer bonded to the host pipe.

This process seals cracks, bridges gaps, and restores structural integrity. It’s especially effective for long, straight pipe sections with partial damage. With a special connection liner kit, CIPP can also rehabilitate Y-connectors.

Compared to spray or brush epoxy lining, CIPP can handle more severe damage because it reinforces the pipe’s structure rather than just coating it.

Advantages

  • Repairs more extensive damage than spray/brush methods
  • Adds structural reinforcement to the existing pipe

Disadvantages

  • Limited in the length that can be lined at one time
  • Y-connectors require a special liner kit
  • Minor risk of root intrusion if branch connections are not fully sealed

Pipe Bursting: When the Old Pipe Is Beyond Saving

Pipe Bursting

Pipe Bursting

Pipe bursting is the most powerful trenchless replacement method, ideal when the existing pipe is severely damaged or completely failed. Using a specialized tool with a bursting head, technicians break apart the old pipe while simultaneously pulling a brand-new HDPE pipe into place.

Unlike lining methods, pipe bursting completely replaces the old pipe and can even increase its diameter, improving flow capacity. It is not affected by the old pipe’s condition but does require straight sections with access points at both ends.

Because it involves fracturing the old pipe outward, pipe bursting must be performed at least two inches away from other underground utilities (such as electrical or gas lines) and requires adequate space at access points.

Advantages

  • Works on pipes in any condition, including complete failure
  • Allows for a larger-diameter replacement pipe
  • Handles a few 45° turns or a single 90° turn

Disadvantages

  • Requires precise knowledge of surrounding utilities
  • Needs more working space at entry and exit points

What Type of Trenchless Sewer Repair Method Should I Use?

There is no single “best” trenchless sewer repair method. The right choice depends on factors such as:

General guidelines:

Trenchless Sewer Repair Method Comparison

Method Structural Repair Preferred Pipe Size Installation Time Invasiveness Cost per Foot Most Feasible Use Cases
Spray/Brush Lining Small cracks and holes 2”–4” Few hours to 1–3 days Minimal $140–$180 Minor damage, multiple connections and turns
CIPP Lining Medium to full structural 2”–18” 1–4 days Limited $120–$180 Severe damage, misalignment, root intrusion
Pipe Bursting Complete replacement 2”–6” 1–2 days Higher (requires space) $110–$145 Full pipe replacement, long deteriorated runs

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Does trenchless sewer repair completely eliminate the need for excavation or demolition?

Not always. While trenchless methods greatly reduce digging, most still require at least one access point, such as a cleanout or small excavation.

What are the main limitations of each trenchless method?

The spray and brush method is most feasible for pipes with minor damage. The CIPP method is used for medium-to-large damage. The pipe bursting method is used for pipes that are beyond repair and have easy access at two points. It is the preferred method for homeowners who want the best quality.

How much does trenchless repair cost? Is traditional excavation cheaper?

It depends on the situation. On average:

  • Spray/Brush Epoxy Lining—$150–$190 per foot
  • Pipe Bursting—$135–$165 per foot
  • CIPP Spot Repair—$1,800–$3,500 for 5–25 feet

Traditional methods may be less expensive in certain cases, but they are often more disruptive and require more restoration work afterward.

Does epoxy or HDPE lining withstand pressure as well as cast iron?

Yes—often better. Cast iron is prone to rust over time, while epoxy-lined or HDPE pipes are resistant to corrosion, making them more durable in the long term.

How long do trenchless repairs last?

Typically, between 50 and 100 years, depending on the method and conditions.

Are there size limitations for trenchless methods?

For pipe bursting and CIPP, 2 to 6-inch pipes are recommended. Virtually no limits exist for spray/brush epoxy lining.

Are trenchless methods environmentally friendly?

Yes. They use fewer chemicals, minimize soil disturbance, and avoid large-scale demolition.

Does epoxy lining reduce pipe diameter?

Slightly—by about 1.5 to 3 mm. This is usually negligible and does not impact flow. In fact, pipe bursting can increase pipe diameter if needed.

Will the pipe get scratched when clearing a clog?

For CIPP inversion, only hydro-jet and cable snakes are allowed. Using anything else will void the warranty. For CIPP pull-in-place, you can use a cable, snake, or hydrogen without voiding the warranty. Spray/brush coating also allows for cable snaking and hydro jetting.

X